KnightByrd · VERIS
Public record · free to search
FTC Notice of Penalty Offenses index/Viva Life Science, Inc.
Viva Life Science, Inc.
This company appears on 2 of the Federal Trade Commission’s published Notice of Penalty Offenses recipient lists.
The record
Appearing on more than one list is uncommon: 50 of the 2,527 recipients do. It means the Commission wrote to this company about more than one category of conduct. It still is not a finding about any of them.
What these notices cover
In the Commission’s own terms. A notice puts a company on formal notice that the described conduct has been found unlawful in earlier administrative cases, which is what makes civil penalties of up to $50,120 per violation available under 15 U.S.C. § 45(m)(1)(B) if that company later engages in it.
- Substantiation of product claims665 recipients
- Failing to have competent and reliable evidence for product claims, failing to have competent and reliable scientific evidence for health or safety claims, failing to have at least one well-controlled human clinical trial for claims that a product treats a serious disease, and misrepresenting the level or type of substantiation for a claim.
- Money-making opportunities1,131 recipients
- Misrepresenting the earnings a participant can expect, and failing to have evidence for claims about income, profits or business performance.
What this record does not say
- It does not say Viva Life Science, Inc. did anything wrong.
- It does not say any claim this company has made is unsupported.
- It is not an enforcement action, a complaint, a consent order or a penalty.
- It does not mean the Commission investigated this company.
- It means one thing only: the FTC included this name on a published list of businesses it put on notice about the conduct described above.
What does Viva Life Science, Inc. currently claim on its own site?
Being on a list is a fact about a letter. The question it raises is a different one: what do your published pages assert today, and what evidence sits beside each assertion?
We read public pages and return an inventory — every claim found, and which of them would face a substantiation question if somebody asked. It is a reading, not a verdict. It does not determine whether any claim is adequate, and it is not legal advice. A reading is private to the company that requests it.
Also on the substantiation of product claims list
The rest of the same public list. Named here because that is the only relationship this record establishes — not as a comparison, and not as a judgement about any of them.
Look up another company
All five recipient lists — 2,527 companies — are searchable together in one place, free and without an account.
Compiled from the Federal Trade Commission’s published Notice of Penalty Offenses recipient lists, which are public record. We link to the Commission rather than rehost its documents. If you believe this record is inaccurate, the authoritative source is ftc.gov.